Category Archives: Movies

‘Billy Jack’ dead at 82

abc Billy-Jack-2
Tom Laughlin as Billy Jack

Any boomer worth his salt remembers the Billy Jack franchise of films. The tough hippie with a heart of gold. They were a big deal back in the early seventies. Everyone had heard of Billy Jack. The page of “recent deaths” of celebrities in the Sunday paper had a couple of interesting tidbits in the article about Tom Laughlin’s life.

They said his “production and marketing of Billy Jack set a standard for breaking the rules on and off the screen”. And, “a long struggle by Laughlin to gain control of the low-budget, self-financed movie, a model for guerilla filmmaking”. That’s interesting, why would you have to have a legal struggle to “gain control” of a self-financed movie? Why would you have to fight and scratch to make movies at all? Isn’t that the purpose of Hollywood?

That caused me to go to Wikipedia and read up on Laughlin. Hard as it may be to believe, it kind of sounds like Warner Brothers tried to cheat him out of various rights to his property, including television rights. I know it sounds ridiculous that a Hollywood studio would try to cheat someone, but that’s the way it sounds.

Searching for the cause of this dislike of Laughlin, I looked at his earlier career. I saw the 1960 Christian film, The Young Sinner. Then there was the 1963 Christian film, We Are All Christ. Then there was the 1965 Christian film that was never completed about a Catholic priest named Father William DuBay. So I can’t imagine what it would be that would cause a young Christian in Hollywood to have trouble making films. I’m stumped.

Hollywood says they  just “make what people want to see”, so you would have thought they would embrace the wildly popular Laughlin. The guy who made huge profits on barely financed films. Nope, they fought tooth and nail to stifle him, shut him down and rip him off, I can’t imagine why.

“American Hustle” ripped me off!

abcd American Hustle (2)

Oh my gosh that was a bad movie! I want my $7 back. I was so excited to see it, I had read the review in the Friday paper by Bill Goodykoontz, 4 1/2 Stars, the delicious  Jennifer Lawrence was in it, an 11:00 showing Saturday morning at the Fleur, how does it get any better than that? The reviews conned me into seeing it. Who paid them off? I would really like to know what is behind a deception like this. Oscar talk? For what??? It was a bomb. Luckily no one died, it was that bad. They spent $40 million on this?

Identifying a quality movie isn’t that tough. It will either have great performances, a great script, or wonderful cinematography. This movie had about 5 minutes of each, and that don’t cut it. I remember when Jennifer Lawrence won the Oscar for Silver Linings Playbook, I was a little suspicious then. I’m thinking, what movie did they watch?  For God’s sake, Winter’s Bone was three times the movie that piece of trash was, and it didn’t get squat. I’m thinking, is director David O. Russell wired in? Is that what this is all about? Yep, that’s it. Bloodlines. There ain’t no other way to explain it.

With all the 4 1/2 Star reviews and Oscar buzz, I was all psyched up to see this. The closest thing to a good performance was Jeremy Renner as Mayor Carmine Polito. His part also included the only attempt at cinematography, before the speech. Lawrence’s character was so clichéd and two dimensional it was a crime. DeNiro as a mobster, oooh, how original is that …. Russell ran with the same cast and the same tendencies. They say some authors keep writing the same book, well some directors keep making the same movie.

Christian Bale and Bradley Cooper probably have some real talent, it was just very well hidden by the director. Amy Adams is just irritating. Now that she is big time, Lawrence will probably never make another decent picture. Oh well, we’ll always have Burning Plain, Poker House and Winter’s Bone. Time to move on, next good actress please!

Hollywood needs to institute a few rules. 1.) No recognizable stars for one year. 2.) Only new scripts, no remakes or sequels for one year. 3.) No directors who have had a previous feature film, only directors of shorts and documentaries. 4.) No budgets over 4 million dollars. 5.) Perhaps the only real answer, Hollywood must close for one year. The only thing that could be shown are foreign films and student films.

That might be best, flush the system, scrap it all and start over. Seriously folks, I just read it in today’s paper, Paul Rudd has been cast to play, wait for it, Ant-Man! Are we serious? Ant-Man? Are we a nation of 12-year-olds? Over the last 20 years, we’ve had how many comic book superheroes? I wonder who owns the rights to all that crap? Follow the money. What’s scary, is that Hollywood influences (infects) the entire world. Maybe if there were more independent theaters, there would be more independent films, less control, more art. A 16-year-old with a Canon and 14 days can do better than this. I saw a film at a festival that they shot on a Nokia phone, they didn’t spend no $40 million making that one. Hollywood has everything but talent. Tyler Perry at his worst is better than this, at least then you see new faces.

The only good thing out of it was a trip to Zanzibar’s!

[As an example, last year Ben Affleck as director of  Argo,  set the mood , the time period, and the context for the exact same period as Hustle. THAT’S how you do it! ]

abcd Busy! (2)

abcde Mocha (2)

abcdefg Zanzibar's pets (2)

abcdef The Fleur (2)

abcdefg Hustle (2)
Don’t let it hustle you!                                                                          All photographs by DME

A Madea Christmas

aaa Q3MDE@__V1__SX640_SY720_
‘Lacey’ played by Tika Sumpter and Conner in A Madea Christmas

Hmm… talk about hot and cold. Wow, and I love Tyler Perry. I can imagine what the people who hate him are saying. That movie was all over the place. I think Tyler needs to discover the word “collaboration”.

As pictured above, Tika Sumpter was a great addition to the movie, as was Larry the Cable Guy, Kathy Najimy and a young Noah Urrea. That’s the part I love about Tyler Perry movies, all the new faces you’ll never see anywhere else. The locations are good.

But man, that writing… the “black folks running from the Klan in Alabama” bit, the fake southern accents by the antagonist and his son. There was zero chemistry between the Lacey and Conner characters. One minute so good, the next so bad.

I support Tyler’s Christmas movie, because he hammers the point home in the film what Christmas is supposed to be about. I’ll give him that, he’s not afraid to  say the ‘J’ word. But man dude, get some help on the writing…

“A film icon comes stomping back into theaters”

gtorcht

Really? 10,000 scripts in Hollywood, and you got to go back 60 years and resuscitate a very mediocre monster flick? Hmm… somehow I question the creative genius behind this. It almost makes me wonder why. It almost makes me wonder who owns the rights to Godzilla. Follow the money. It is almost like the art of film making in Hollywood is more like a whorehouse, not much passion and not much honesty.

With all the original ideas out there, it just seems a shame. The line I like best is when Hollywood says, “we just make what people want to see… “. Poppycock. The biggest moneymakers have always been G Rated family flicks. The movies everyone can go to, movies like the Sound of Music, Star Wars, ET, Twister, The Lion King, not psychologically  disturbed Quentin Tarantino crap. The same thing happens on TV. It might not be great theater that people flock to, but it isn’t the crap Hollywood is trying to force on us.

The Great Beauty

GB peach
Photograph by DME

Paolo Sorrentino’s film has been called by critics a tribute to fellow Italian director Federico Fellini. That does make me want to see La Dolce Vita and Roma, because if this is a tribute, I want to see the inspiration.

Toni Servillo is ‘Jep Gambordella’, the aging playboy who discovers upon his 65th birthday that there may be more to life than eternal narcissism. Eternity seems beckoning, and questions about the great beyond aren’t answered here, but they are alluded to.

I assume The Great Beauty of the films title is a combination of the beauty of the main character’s first love Elisa, Rome itself and maybe life in general. Contrasted with this beauty is the ugliness of the wretched excess of Jep’s life until now.

I cannot say with 100 % certainty (but close to), that Hollywood could never make a movie like this from a technical aspect at least. From my point of view, why this movie is so beautiful in and of itself, is the photography. The lighting to be specific.

Hollywood is more about things going flash – bang (!) in a very loud way. Computer Generated Images and product merchandising are more their style. The idea that they could pull off what Sorrentino has, staggers the mind.

Any photographer has had those times where it all comes together in a perfect shoot. This film is 2 hours and 20 minutes of perfect shots. Not knowing anything about film production, I would have to guess the credit goes to cinematographer Luca Bigazzi, or maybe it is some lighting director. I would not be surprised to learn that it was shot on actual film, it is that rich.

Maybe 20 % of the movie was shot in daylight. The rest of the film  was shot at dusk, twilight and night. Most people can’t do that well, this film did. At those light levels you have to be spot on with exposures. The result is deep colors and wonderful shadows.

The other aspect besides Toni Servillo’s performance and the lighting, was the pulsing music during the dance scenes. It seemed to capture the essence of the “passionate” Italians.

IMG_4635 root beer

‘The Book Thief’

aaa The Book Thief! (2)
photograph by DME

Now that was fun. Sure it was dealing once again with Hollywood’s singular obsession with Adolf Hitler. This time they at least hinted at the 5.3 million “other” that also perished. That was a nice change. The title character’s mother, a communist, being “taken away”, we assume murdered.

The Book Thief is played wonderfully well by Sophie Nélisse. She, Geoffrey Rush and a young Rudy played by Nico Liersch were the saving graces of the film. The storyline and cinematography were nothing to write home about.

As it turns out, war is hell, and as evidenced by our modern world, we have  not learned that lesson since the time this story took place some 75 years ago.

Towards the end of the film, there is the “there’s got to be a morning after” shot of the German village, with a subtitle, “1945, Americans occupy Germany”; with the implied hope of a new beginning. The thought that ran through my head, was that Hitler occupied various parts of Europe, then we and the Soviets did, now Muslims do. I don’t think Europeans will be getting rid of  them. Europeans lost a war they didn’t know they were fighting.

Bagel Beau (2) amfjti

bbb Movies 12 from Subway (2)

The Highway Walkers

Highway Walkers! (2)  njjcj

photograph by DME

“The Highway Walkers” shown Thursday night at the Wild Rose film festival in Des Moines was a fun cross-country adventure. Two buddies decide to thumb their way from the Leon-Weldon metroplex in southern Iowa to Mount Hood near Portland, Oregon.  Darrell Johnston and Josiah Laubenstein are our two adventurers out to discover why the practice of hitchhiking has stopped being commonplace.

“Along the way they struggle to get rides, play music at nursing homes and experience the beauty and hardship America has to offer.  This trip forges them as friends and changes their outlook on life and hitchhiking.”

We see Darrell and Josiah stop at a mission in Denver where Jesus saves the homeless and the drunks from off of the streets of Denver.  We meet a woman who sees their ad on Craig’s List and takes them on their next leg along with her huge Malamute in the back seat.  It is a thoroughly entertaining travelogue by two video virgins.  It is staggering what two first-timers have done.

It was an interesting study in human nature and the innate goodness they found in the strangers they encountered.  They discovered that even in 2011 murky danger did not lurk around every corner.  They said that they found that people were basically good.  Their film proved the timeless truth that we viewers are voyeurs, we like to meet new people, hear their conversations and peer into their lives.

Walker Darrell (2)
Darrell Johnston after the Q&A following the screening of his film, “The Highway Walkers”.
photograph by DME

Wild Rose film festival takes it up a notch

Spread out over a week, and mostly during the evening hours, and just one screen, the Wild Rose isn’t the most convenient film fest, but its selections this year have been some of the best. At what price though? $96? 2 people for 2 nights, and 1 person one night, $96? That’s 6 films. I think a film will really have to standout before I go back. IIFF is only $25 for 2 DAYS. Interrobang is free. The Manhattan Short FF held at the Art Center is free also.

Frankly, there haven’t been a lot of standouts the last year or so at the Iowa film fests. The 4 I’ve seen this year at WR were well done, and one, 23 Minutes to Sunrise was superb. I would call it best of show. It stars Eric Roberts and Nia Peeples and was directed by Jay Kanzler. I ordered it from Amazon the next day, it’s a keeper.

aaa 90741303414127919991

Other keepers were Lost Cinemas of Greater Des Moines, Masque, and Guest House. Tonight’s final showings are two Iowa films, The Highway Walkers and These Hopeless Savages.

The WR plays  at the Fleur Cinema and is put on by Kimberly and John Busbee.

Eric+Roberts+2nd+Annual+Feel+Good+Film+Festival+GNCEny5sx0-l
Eric Roberts of 23 Minutes to Sunrise

As an interesting side note, when I got the DVD it took me a minute to figure out what I didn’t like about the intro. It turns out there’s a quirk about copyright laws that allowed the playing of Leonard Cohen’s ‘Everybody Knows’ in a live venue like the film festival, but he couldn’t sell it on the DVD. So he replaced it with some non-descript headbanger “music”. It really detracted from the mood.