Category Archives: Movies

What happened?

Steve McQueen – that object hanging out of his mouth is what we called a “cigarette”. It contained “tobacco” which we would light with a match and inhale. Don’t ask me why.

Saturday morning I’m up early and I see Steve McQueen in a movie looking rather rough, and yes it was the prison flick (flique since it was a French movie) Papillon. Like Brando and Bogart I never appreciated him until I was older. So I watched the final 90 minutes or so (its a 157 minutes I believe). Its a true story about Frenchman Henri Charrière wrongly convicted of murder in 1931. He spends the next 14 years in the French penal colony of Guiana and ‘Devil’s Island’. Needless to say the corruption of French prison authorities was legendary. Money or cooperation could purchase you a much easier sentence. A fascinating story. Reviewers say as good as the movie was it didn’t fully capture the hardship Charrière faced in real life.

It was a very good movie. They went on location with a couple of good actors. They took along a great story. Went past the 2 hour “barrier” and made a memorable story. According to IMDB they had a $12,000,000 dollar budget. By comparison another McQueen movie Bullitt, had a budget of $5,500,000. Thousands of books get published around the world every year. Of those there are hundreds of wonderful stories. Does Hollywood look to expand the art and make movies of any of those? Oh hell no.

To make my point, when looking up facts for the movie, I see they remade Papillon in 2017. I’m not kidding. They must be though. You think you’re going to top the original? Steve McQueen and Dustin Hoffman? You’re delusional. Just staggering the crap  that comes out of Hollywood. The amount of inspirational stories that are never told is mind-blowing. The thought provoking, the heartfelt, stories of wonder that will never see the light of day. Truly sad. Instead they’ll continue to remake Star Wars for another 40 years. The first 40 years of merchandising evidently wasn’t enough. We live in a sad and mediocre world. “Reach for the middle!

Since we don’t learn from history…

103 years ago. We’ve learnt nothing. Nadda, zip, zero. The American taxpayer still hasn’t figured out he works to pay the taxes to feed the military-industrial complex. That’s it. That is the reason you exist. This movie 1917 was pretty good, Brits doing the stiff upper lip thing, before their society crapped out. Few people understand why WW I happened. They buy into the children’s storybook version of history, some claptrap about the assassination of an Arch Duke Ferdinand or something. Bullshit. WW I happened as the “crisis” to usher in the League of Nations. Americans weren’t so stupid at that point, it didn’t pass.

Did the “Deep State” let that stop them? Oh hell no. They simply had a bigger and badder war to scare the hell out of people; WW II. This time they succeeded and the United Nations was born. Freedom doesn’t jibe with the plans of the Elite. They have always desired World Government. That’s all the 20th Century was about, having a lot of people bleed to further their goals. People are so naïve. It doesn’t hurt to have government education to keep people stupid. They seem to have done a crackerjack job as far as that goes. History is not taught obviously. War, what is it good for?

Oh they teach the party line, but they don’t teach history.

Donny and Marie!

I watched it. One reason. Marie Osmond. She was 17, 18 and 19 when it ran (we’re the same age). I saw her in a Nutrisystem ad the other day and thought she looks pretty good for 60. I’d forgotten what a standout she was 40 years ago. I had to go back and add her to my Most Beautiful Women of the 70’s post. What made her such a knockout (other than her looks) was she seemed so nice. So wholesome. She has made quite a career for herself, talk shows, variety show, a couple of movies, Branson show, Vegas show. Lots of kids, a tough marriage. She’s a survivor.

0000 5

00000 6

Christmas movies

I watched Alicia Malone introduce ‘The Bishop’s Wife‘ last night (Christmas Eve) on TCM as part of their “Christmas lineup”. Of course it has nothing to do with nor does it reference anything to do with Jesus’ birth. This is an advanced intellectual concept (that Christmas should have something to do with Jesus) but I just can’t seem to let it go. On Sunday 12/22 its close to Christmas so they play King of Kings & The Greatest Story Ever Told, movies on the life of Jesus. That’s because Hollywood never made any Christmas movies (something to do with the birth of Jesus). All they ever made were Santa movies.

Which is fine, but don’t make Santa movies and then call them Christmas movies. It confuses people. Its a free country, make what you want. But call them what they are. They’re Santa movies. Whoever invented Santa was a genius if his intent was to remove Jesus from Christmas. Celebrate a nonspecific winter holiday if you want. Make movies about evergreen trees and hot cocoa if that’s your thing, but don’t call them Christmas movies. Its disrespecting the Lord of the universe. I don’t care if the rest of the world thinks I’m nuts, I’m right. 

Cary Grant in this is in his prime. 43 years old and at his dashing and dapper best. Loretta Young absolutely beautiful and refined. David Niven perfect as the fussbudget Bishop. A lot of the cinematography was just wonderful.

Richard Jewell

Clint brought it home. His entire career I wondered if he was faking it with his blue collar movies, but ‘The 15:17 to Paris‘ and ‘Richard Jewell‘ proved he was for real. He has the best values. He “gets it” better than anybody. Just wish there was a way to tell him. Those 2 movies were an homage to the common man we’ll never see again come out of Hollywood. Its just the most beautiful thing when you realize what he’s done. Its very hard to put into words. Its clear Hollywood has no idea what he’s done, from them he receives criticism not accolades.

In these 2 movies he’s told the only story worth telling; the human existence. The good side of people. The wonderful side of people. The side of people that gives you hope not despair. Ordinary people doing extraordinary things. He’s not remaking some trite tale from years ago. You don’t see this coming from ‘Dirty Harry’. You don’t see this coming from ‘Philo Beddoe’. You don’t see this coming from Clint Eastwood. He’s a rough and tumble guy. As a GI in the early fifties his transport plane crashes into the ocean off the coast of California and he has to swim miles in the open ocean to live. He is not some kind of sissy guy.

What Clint told was a real story of human triumph. He didn’t tell a story to get Oscar gold. To impress his Hollywood pals. To pad his bank account. He told a story of a real man doing his job. Doing it well. Living through the hell. Battling on in spite of the hell. Keeping his dignity. You get to watch a man whose wholesome values gave him a foundation built on rock, not sand. Jewell weathered the storm. He came out better because of it. Jewell showed himself to be light years better than his “betters”. For Eastwood it was a labor of love, his love for humanity.

Scrooge

Charles Dickens wrote a story that Hollywood and the theater loves. And audiences too I would say. I think I have a copy of the book, I’ll have to read it again. Your viewpoint changes a wee bit in 30 or 40 years. Dickens only lived to be 58. I want to go back and see what his intention was, not how his work was interpreted. Hollywood does not have a good relationship with Jesus, I want to see what his was. Because that is the nagging problem I have with the tale, that these fellows having received a visit from a series of ghosts, then work their way to heaven in the succeeding days by giving to the poor, is how they portray it on film and in the theater.

Just last night I saw a wonderful version by Richard Williams that won the Oscar in 1972 for Best Animated Short. Incredibly the shortfall was the voice of Ebenezer played by Alastair Sims, who had done a simply wonderful film version 20 years earlier. But for anyone who appreciates nice drawings, I highly encourage you to watch it on YouTube. I wish I could see it on my TV’s large screen. The artwork compared to today’s claptrap is not to be believed. In just one scene the Spirit takes Scrooge around the English countryside and even out to sea so that he can see how Christmas is celebrated from the rich and famous to the lowly and humble.

Different versions differ on how much ‘bible’ they throw in. In the 1951 version (or was it the 1938 version with Reginald Owen?) there is a surprising amount of bible reading and the singing of ‘God Rest Ye Merry Gentlemen’ (“… Christ the Lord our Savior was born on Christmas day!“). In the 1984 version with George C. Scott I remember very little. Same with the 1979 adaptation starring Henry Winkler. This one is actually An American Christmas Carol and is one of my favorites. Dave Trumbore may not cover them all here, but he does rank 20 of them from worst to best. A must see list as no one could have seen all of these!

English literature I’ve noticed over the years has a common theme of a monetary windfall coming from a change of heart or an old wealthy relative kicking off at an opportune time. Americans of course come at it from a different perspective in that we dramatize the hero’s hard work or ingenuity in inventing a better mouse trap. Whatever the case it makes for a fine story. In a lot of ways corporate America hasn’t moved the compassion ball an inch and are still well entrenched in vulture capitalism.

Perhaps my favorite of all is the story change Henry Winkler’s version took with the orphanage. In this case ‘Benedict Slade’ returns at the end to the orphanage he grew up in, to find a boy who now needs his help. As a practical and literary device it is superb. Henry lets a little of the ‘Fonz’ show as he deals in a compassionate manner with the tough youth.

[As far as Dickens’ theology at least in the first few pages seems quite evident. He refers to the fireplace in Scrooges room built long ago by a Dutch tradesman. He describes the tiles as depicting biblical scenes from both new and old testament. Later when Marley is berating Ebenezer he refers to his lack of “Christian spirit”. There is an interesting video here from the British Library on the motivation for writing A Christmas Carol. Dickens was aghast at the working conditions very young children and women were being forced to work in.]

42 years

They had a heartwarming story on Breitbart of a dying patient who got his wish for an advanced screening of the latest Star Wars flick ‘The Rise of Skywalker‘. Poor kid. But whenever I see something about the Star Wars franchise only 1 thought comes to mind, Hollywood had 1 original idea in 42 years and promptly beat it to death. Star Wars beget Star Trek movies. Which beget a number of space series on TV. Battle Star Galactica, Buck Rogers, Star Trek the Next Generation, Deep Space Nine… and no doubt a host of shows I can’t remember. I think a lot of things were better in 1977. Be it fashion, cars, music or any number of things.

If you read any interviews with directors and such they always think the film making art was advanced by various inventions, like the -Steadicam in 1976 or Computer Generated Graphics in the 90s. Good grief. The Golden Age of Hollywood truly was 1935 – 1965. Before that they had some great silent films, though most of the really good ones were made overseas. I remember one interview in particular with George Lucas at the start of the release of the fourth film. He was all excited about the computer technology that just wasn’t available in 1976 when he was shooting the first movie. Ha.

Good film has absolutely nothing to do with technological advancement. One of the best examples of that is the chariot race scene in the original Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ in 1925. Metropolis was a good one. The ones that tend to blow me away are the silent films of France, Germany and Italy. Later India had a very strong film industry. The Russian Jews that founded Hollywood seemed better at monopoly and forcing out competition than they were at good filmmaking, but even that was better than today’s claptrap. Hollywood puts too much faith in silicone, whether it be chips or breasts.


Metropolis (1927)

[A movie on TCM this morning is a prime example; ‘Scaramouche‘ (1923). How Hollywood made it is beyond me, it seems really good. Very good. Clowns, gowns, wonderful cinematography. Not overacted in that “silent picture” kind of way. And this is way before CGI and Steadicams.]

Daniel Ruettiger

[From Wikipedia:] “Rudy is a 1993 American  film directed by David Anspaugh. It is an account of the life of Daniel “Rudy” Ruettiger, who harbored dreams of playing football at the University of Notre Dame despite significant obstacles. It was the first film that the Notre Dame administration allowed to be shot on campus since Knute Rockne, All American in 1940.”

I happened to catch the climatic end to the ultimate underdog story this morning. You can’t help but get a lump in your throat when the first teamers walk into Coach Devine’s office to give up their jersey so Rudy can dress for Saturday’s game. Rudy makes the call to his friend when he finds out he going to “dress” for the game, “I’ve never asked anything of you, but I want you to be there Saturday!” His parents and brother show up to the stadium, his best friend, the embittered groundskeeper.

The game clock is winding down and there is little time left for Rudy to get in the game (so that his name will show up in the record books). The slow chant builds up and soon the entire stadium is chanting, “Rudy! Rudy!” The quarterback goes against the coach’s orders and calls a trick play so the offense can score and defensive Rudy can be put on the field. Rudy runs down the field on the ensuing kickoff, his name forever sealed now in Notre Dame records. He yells to the sidelines, “What do I do? What do I do?” The defensive coordinator tells him to stay in for the last play, when he sacks the Georgia Tech quarterback on the last play!

The final gun sounds and the crowd goes crazy! The final credits say no player has ever been carried off the hallowed Notre Dame field since that great moment in 1975. What a film. The photo I used is of the real Rudy. I contemplated using a glossy Hollywood eye catcher from the film, when I realized that would miss the whole point. Sean Astin who played Rudy looks to be a great guy. But as the son of celebrities Patty Duke and John Astin, he was born on 3rd base. The story of triumph is Ruettiger.

What the real Ruettiger accomplished was incredible. Humble roots, dyslexia, small, slow, the only thing he did have was heart. Its also an incredibly sad film. The reality is much of what he did then would be impossible now for a young person to accomplish. In those day you actually could “work your way through college”. Kids today would have a hard time believing that. College costs today are a “life debt” that affect the graduate’s decisions for decades. Athletics has now dropped all pretense of being anything other than a business. Recent rulings now allow the athlete to at least profit off of his “name and image“. Universities and armies of coaches have done that for years.

A coach today making $4 million a year would never go out on a limb for a kid. The selfish nature of people today would look at exalting someone by carrying them off the field as unthinkable. But that $4 million dollars? That’s not BS. A very, very, mediocre coach at Iowa has been making that going back at least 15 years. “March Madness”, the college basketball extravaganza? Guess what that contract is worth to CBS? In its most recent contract CBS paid the NCAA $10.8 billion dollars.

And we’re supposed to believe in the sanctity of “student athletics”? I was getting ready to post this when I realized I couldn’t “bring it home”. I was having a hard time figuring out what my major point was. Everything in America has been turned into such big business. The odds have been so stacked against the individual. Horatio Alger is dead and buried. The ‘American dream’ is now a nightmare. I think an outgrowth of that is the traction flat-out socialists are having in the 2020 presidential race. I don’t think people could explain it, but they know something is wrong in America.

Corporatism. That’s the word they’re looking for. Life is a series of pendulum swings. It has swung too long in favor of business (perhaps always). I think people realize this even if they couldn’t explain it. What Bernie and Elizabeth Warren are saying resonates with them. Socialism is of course Fool’s Gold, its a shiny lure with a hook in it they won’t feel until they bite down. At least we have a “dream”. Mexicans don’t, they have to come here for one. Brit’s don’t. Read their classics sometime. In the 1800s when old Horatio was writing his tales of rags to riches, British literature was consistently filled with the poor, deserving heroine who makes out when a rich relative assumes room temperature.

In the 1980’s and 1990’s there was a series of chess matches between the titans of the day and versions of IBM’s “Big Blue” supercomputer. For the longest time humans always proved master of the machine. Sometime around 2000 that was no longer the case. We no longer are in charge of our own destiny, we are simply along for the ride.

Did somebody die?

TCM is showing a black movie, did somebody die? In the 70’s they had a kind of “separate but equal” scenario with white films / black films. Then somebody decided it was “exploitation” and black people no longer appeared in films at all (Oh excuse me, Denzel Washington, Will Smith & Halle Berry did). I think a lot of it was the Elites in Hollywood weren’t getting what they considered “their cut”, or have control of what was getting made. In time I think the quality of the films would have naturally improved and become a serious venue outside of Hollywood control. Kind of what Tyler Perry did by moving his operation to Atlanta. He had total control and he kept the profits, becoming one of the wealthiest men around.

Section One

My track record is I usually don’t discover something until 40 or 50 years after its heyday. So I’m doing better on La Femme Nikita, its only 20 years old. Why I’m not more culturally aware I have no idea. The premise of Nikita was that Section One of the ‘Center’ saw this convicted murderer as someone they could make into their ultimate assassin, given her beauty and physical skills. Wrongfully convicted of murdering the cop and of being a drug addict, she is forced to do their bidding or become “cancelled” herself.

The 96 episodes of the Canadian series ran from 1997 – 2001. Most of it filmed around Toronto, though the secret  agent was a globetrotter as I understand it. The only other series (which I didn’t watch either) that had the ‘cool’ factor this one did was Miami Vice. Part of the reason for this was they used mind control to flush her emotions so she’d be the cold blooded killer they needed. It only half works as she constantly struggled to retain her humanity against incredible odds.

Peta Wilson started out as a fashion model (big surprise), so she already has this air about her of the “yes I know I’m the most fabulous thing to ever walk the planet“. In her case it just happens to be true. One thing I’ve noticed having done several posts on beautiful women, the ones who were models rarely had a bad photo. The photographer may have had a bad idea or execution, but the model pretty much always did their part. At the end of the post I’m just going to throw down a bunch of photos of the Australian born goddess that I consider great. It was really hard to pick the lead one  for this post. So many captured the gist of her character.

So anyway, thanks to Central Iowa’s ME TV channel 8.2 for putting this show on at 11 pm. Its worth staying up for. If you like tall, leggy blondes that is.

La Femme Nikita TV Series (1997-2001) starring Peta Wilson, Don Francks, Eugene Robert Glazer, Roy Dupuis, Matthew Ferguson and Alberta Watson – dvdbash.com

La Femme Nikita TV Series (1997-2001) starring Peta Wilson, Don Francks, Eugene Robert Glazer, Roy Dupuis, Matthew Ferguson and Alberta Watson – dvdbash.com

La Femme Nikita TV Series (1997-2001) starring Peta Wilson, Don Francks, Eugene Robert Glazer, Roy Dupuis, Matthew Ferguson and Alberta Watson – dvdbash.com

La Femme Nikita TV Series (1997-2001) starring Peta Wilson, Don Francks, Eugene Robert Glazer, Roy Dupuis, Matthew Ferguson and Alberta Watson – dvdbash.com

La Femme Nikita TV Series (1997-2001) starring Peta Wilson, Don Francks, Eugene Robert Glazer, Roy Dupuis, Matthew Ferguson and Alberta Watson – dvdbash.com

La Femme Nikita TV Series (1997-2001) starring Peta Wilson, Don Francks, Eugene Robert Glazer, Roy Dupuis, Matthew Ferguson and Alberta Watson – dvdbash.com

What I consider the best ‘Nikita’ photo.