Tag Archives: TCM

Director William Friedkin

TCM was profiling director William Friedkin last night. I found that out after the closing credits rolled on the The French Connection (1971). Not being a particularly knowledgeable film buff, I’d had no idea who the director was, or that it had won Best Picture, Best Director and Best Actor. I don’t know “good movies”, I just know what I like.

So when Ben Mankiewicz got through with that segment’s chat with Friedkin and the opening credits began to roll for To Live and Die in LA, I sat straight up. I have a pretty good eye for talent. Don’t know why. But I had just left The French Connection, a film that had always given me the vibe of “this is a serious film”. Gene Hackman, Roy Scheider, the streets of New York, they can give you that impression.

The opening credits for this movie gave me the same impression. I had never heard of To Live and Die in LA back in ’85. I suppose a lot of that was I was overseas in the service at the time. It might be ‘one world’ now, but it certainly wasn’t back then. I just love a location film, and I could see it was going to be one of those. 80’s super villain Willem Dafoe was in it, I’ve always liked him. The star was William Petersen, who for me is one of those guys who you go “I know him, where is he from?”

The first thought I had was this is Miami Vice in LA! Turns out the creator of Miami Vice (Michael Mann) had thought so too and had sued Friedkin (he lost the case). I checked the IMDB ranking for both films (Connection & Die in LA), 7.7 & 7.3 respectively. That makes sense. I started noticing some holes in this new movie. It would never win the ‘big three’ Academy Awards that French Connection would. Friedkin made that one when he was a young and hungry 35. He made LA when he was 50.

The counterfeiting sequences in To Live and Die in LA are amazing. The old school artistry was incredible. Friedkin shot it in such a way that made a boring subject just fascinating. Dafoe as the master counterfeiter really helps create the aura. William Petersen as Secret Service agent ‘Richard Chance’ does a good job, but its clear after awhile why Gene Hackman’s name is a household word, and his isn’t. Its interesting Friedkin worked with Petersen numerous times, but had to be convinced about Hackman.

But this post is about the director’s career, not just one movie. Which is funny because I generally say directors have just one movie in them, they just keep remaking it in different ways. Much like authors and their one book. 3 repeating themes with Friedkin are a morally compromised ‘hero’, obsession, and a really great car chase scene. The first and last embody Friedkin in his real life. IMDB says Friedkin did parts of the car chase in French Connection on the streets of New York amongst regular drivers and pedestrians.

If true, that’s just criminal. Just like its said he would fire a gun near an actors head or slap them to get the reaction he wanted. That’s sick. You’re just playacting here, there’s absolutely no reason to harm or put people at risk. The other is the middle theme, his heroes obsession with “getting their man”. Obsession also plays a role in Friedkin’s formative movie growing up, Citizen Kane. I noticed during the interview with Ben Mankiewicz that Friedkin liked to “put on airs”. I’ve noticed that a lot with artistic people, I suppose that is necessary to create the persona of ‘genius’ or whatever.

It reminded me of a contemporary of his that TCM also profiled, director Peter Bogdanovich, who also seemed more likable as a person. Part of that I’m sure is I’m much more a fan of The Last Picture Show (Cybill Shepherd naked), What’s Up, Doc? (funny as hell) and Paper Moon (Ryan and Tatum O’Neill), than I am of serious murder death stuff. But to be fair, Friedkin in his personal life is said to have a wonderful sense of humor, it just doesn’t show up in his movies. I thought this closing little story from Forward dot com was illustrative:

If his sense of humor comes as a surprise, so does his apparent lack of sentimentality. I ask if he’s ever nostalgic. “Not really, no,” he begins. “Only for certain restaurant I used to like. There was a particular hamburger that I used to love that I used to get in a drugstore when I was a kid. Never found that taste of that hamburger since. And I still remember it. I don’t know how they did it.”

[I guess I’m a sucker for film and television that has a surface “cool factor”. Maybe everyone has a different idea what that is. For me its shows like Miami Vice, La Femme Nikita and to a lesser degree CSI Miami. Which is why I really wanted to like To Live and Die in LA, even if it turned out to be fairly cheesy. It explains why even though I watch the old movie channels, it doesn’t get played. Just kind of interesting how the same guy can go from making The Exorcist and The French Connection, to some of his later stuff, and employing Dean Stockwell.]

Who put the ape in apricot?

What do they got that I ain’t got? Courage! That pretty much sums up modern Hollywood. Classic Hollywood had boldness (and subsidies as it turns out). TCM (thank God and Ted Turner for them) actually has a show on why 1939 was such an incredible year for movie making. They were at the frontend of their monopoly, before they got fat and lazy. It was in 1941 because of the war that Congress ended some incredible tax breaks for them. And it was an undefinable juncture where you simply had an incredible number of stars. Grant, Stewart, Bogart, Wayne, Davis, Crawford, Hepburn, Garland, Rooney, Gable, O’Hara, Flynn, Powers, Fairbanks, Barrymore, Tracy, Temple, Astaire, Rogers and on and on!

They did it before computers, lasers and helicopters! Maybe the Great Depression had something to do with it, the need for escapist fantasy. Perhaps just as incredible were the wonderful films like The Hunchback of Notre Dame who didn’t get much recognition simply because they were released in the wrong year! At the link above there is a list of all the films released in 1939, its just staggering. Little did I realize my favorites would end up being Stagecoach, Andy Hardy, Goodbye Mr. Chips and The Wizard of Oz.

[Wikipedia] “The year 1939 was one in which the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences nominated ten films for Best Picture”:

Christmas movies

I watched Alicia Malone introduce ‘The Bishop’s Wife‘ last night (Christmas Eve) on TCM as part of their “Christmas lineup”. Of course it has nothing to do with nor does it reference anything to do with Jesus’ birth. This is an advanced intellectual concept (that Christmas should have something to do with Jesus) but I just can’t seem to let it go. On Sunday 12/22 its close to Christmas so they play King of Kings & The Greatest Story Ever Told, movies on the life of Jesus. That’s because Hollywood never made any Christmas movies (something to do with the birth of Jesus). All they ever made were Santa movies.

Which is fine, but don’t make Santa movies and then call them Christmas movies. It confuses people. Its a free country, make what you want. But call them what they are. They’re Santa movies. Whoever invented Santa was a genius if his intent was to remove Jesus from Christmas. Celebrate a nonspecific winter holiday if you want. Make movies about evergreen trees and hot cocoa if that’s your thing, but don’t call them Christmas movies. Its disrespecting the Lord of the universe. I don’t care if the rest of the world thinks I’m nuts, I’m right. 

Cary Grant in this is in his prime. 43 years old and at his dashing and dapper best. Loretta Young absolutely beautiful and refined. David Niven perfect as the fussbudget Bishop. A lot of the cinematography was just wonderful.

Did somebody die?

TCM is showing a black movie, did somebody die? In the 70’s they had a kind of “separate but equal” scenario with white films / black films. Then somebody decided it was “exploitation” and black people no longer appeared in films at all (Oh excuse me, Denzel Washington, Will Smith & Halle Berry did). I think a lot of it was the Elites in Hollywood weren’t getting what they considered “their cut”, or have control of what was getting made. In time I think the quality of the films would have naturally improved and become a serious venue outside of Hollywood control. Kind of what Tyler Perry did by moving his operation to Atlanta. He had total control and he kept the profits, becoming one of the wealthiest men around.

“Why did you tell them, baby?”


The Killing (1956)

By gawd that’s what film is for! I just happened to catch the tail end of this Sunday morning treat, and what a treat it was! Sterling Hayden and his mugs pull off the ultimate heist, they take a racetrack for a cool $2 million dollars. They were gonna get away with it too, but somebody told a dame! A secret is no longer a secret if you told a woman. Elisha Cook tells Marie Windsor who then tells her thugs and they all die in a horrible shootout à la Reservoir Dogs.

Sterling Hayden who hadn’t arrived yet with the dough, is the lone survivor. He’s at the airport with a large suitcase (the $2 mil), and the airline will not let this huge suitcase be carry on! After much arguing Hayden agrees to let it be checked luggage. As he’s standing at the gate on the tarmac, he’s watching his suitcase precariously balanced on the luggage tram as it heads out to the idling plane.

‘Tinkles’ the dog picks that moment to leap out of Aunt Martha’s arms and bolts in front of the tram driver who swerves to avoid the dog. The suitcase with the loot falls to the taxiway breaking open in the fall. The prop wash of the idling planes immediately blows the $2 million all over creation! A decidedly dejected Hayden watches in disbelief, slowly walking to the exit before authorities figure out it was his suitcase.

The ‘film noir’ examples shown on Turner Classic Movies never received the accolades or the budgets of the studio darlings. Filmed in less expensive black and white and cast with underdogs, they often over achieved compared to the glossy, vacuous big budget films when looked at with the hindsight that 60 or 70 years brings. Director Stanley Kubrick himself on Taxi Driver had to film the aftermath of the bodies following the big shootout (the films union cameraman refusing to do the handheld camerawork Kubrick wanted).

The climatic scene where the fortune blows down the runway, reminiscent of The Treasure of the Sierra Madre when the gold dust blows helplessly across the desert. The ill-gotten gain never to be had by anyone and keeping the curse alive. No, film noir went beyond the clichés, the remakes, the boring storylines. Film noir was honest about their film’s motivations; greed and sex. I respect that. The rest of the Hollywood crap factory is about deceptions.

The Dream Factory


‘Saboteur’, (1942)

How devastated I was! To discover once again the barren wasteland that typifies Hollywood’s creativity bucket. I’m channel flipping and come to the end of a movie on TCM. The hero for some reason is advancing on the bad guy at the top of the Statue of Liberty. He’s got a gun on him, yet when the bad guy falls over the rail and is barely hanging on, our hero tries to save him! Well then why were you holding a gun on him?!

Regardless, you see the coat sleeve of the guy in peril slowly bust its seams, then he falls to his death from atop a national monument. That keen computer-like mind of mine kicks in and I think, “Didn’t Hitchcock do this in ‘North by Northwest’, 1959? Yep. A trip to IMDB reveals he didn’t just do it in Saboteur and North by Northwest, he did it nine other times! Yeah! Hitchcock made the same movie 11 times! Incredible. 11 films of the common man wrongly accused fleeing across the country seeking to clear his name (and falling off various famous landmarks I presume).

Oy. They say an author just keeps writing the same story over and over in different forms. At least Harper Lee (Mockingbird) was honest and just wrote one book. People, and that’s assuming Hollywood types are people, respond to positive reinforcement. The reason Hollywood keeps putting out crap, is they make money at it. If people would quit buying tickets to bad movies, and quit watching bad TV, Hollywood would have to change. Way too many people cannot grasp the concept of “voting” with your wallet.

Here are the flat out remakes and different incarnations of the same character currently at local theaters: Spider-Man, Despicable Me, Planet of the Apes, Wonder Woman, Transformers, Cars, The Beguiled, Guardians of the Galaxy and Pirates of the Caribbean. Goodnight that’s pathetic. Why do people SUPPORT bad? I don’t get it. It’s like in our government, we see an ever-growing  collection of idiots and crooks driving our country into the ground. Here’s an idea, quit electing them! I hate being drug down by a nation of fools. I make enough of my own mistakes, I don’t need yours compounding it.

A check of the local channels replaying old TV shows reveals a similar lack of quality. While they may be “original”, they’re certainly not very good, and definitely didn’t age well 30, 40 and 50 years later. Shows like How I Met Your Mother, Night Court, Doogie Howser, Sanford and Son, 2 1/2 Idiots. Its ridiculous. I think back over the 60 years or so of television and what survived well, and once you get past the westerns and some cop shows, there’s only a handful of shows that stood the test of time. Heat of the Night, Police Story, Leave it to Beaver, Adam-12, Brady Bunch, Gilligan’s Island, It Takes a Thief and a few others are the only ones that come to my mind.

Admittedly, taste is demonstrably generational. I’ve heard reports of younger people that purposely watch Saved by the Bell and Friends. And there are older people that enjoy I Love Lucy, for reasons unknown. Nevertheless, I will forever maintain that there is nothing but a tumbleweed blowing across Hollywood’s collective mind. I suppose that would explain the popularity of the various “reality” TV shows. Shows that took Hollywood out of the “creative process”.


Then there are shows like ‘Ghost Whisperer’ that we’ll probably never know why it was popular.