Author Archives: Iowa Life

Unknown's avatar

About Iowa Life

Experiencing life in Iowa.

The Inevitable Defeat of Mister & Pete

aa The-Inevitable-Defeat-of-Mister-and-Pete_114057
Jeffery Wright, Skylan Brooks and Ethan Dizon

So I’m walking through Family Video in west Ames the other day, and I spy this odd little gem. I pretty much refuse to watch big budget Hollywood films, you are simply encouraging their stupidity. Just looking at the cover I knew I wouldn’t be watching the usual suspects but some fresh faces.

Skylan Brooks as ‘Mister‘, and Ethan Dizon as ‘Pete‘ worked really well with Jennifer Hudson, Jordin Sparks and others to make a really nice NY location film. I much prefer a “gritty” urban drama that is not a sequel, remake or comic book. An examination of the human condition versus CGI.

Bag o’ bones

IDA a (2) 1

Ida (Agata Trzebuchowska) spins a new viewpoint to a familiar story, the Holocaust. This film just covers three lives, a mother, a father and a son who were murdered for their farm in Poland during WWII. It is now roughly 20 years later when the daughter of the deceased is about to take her vows as a nun after growing up in the convent as an orphan. Ida (known as Anna by the nuns), finds out she has a living aunt she must meet before taking her vows.

From her aunt she finds out that she is Jewish, she was given up to the convent because she could pass for a gentile, and might survive. That would be my one gripe with the film, I wasn’t able to figure out how her aunt survived, or why her parents and brother were murdered by the farmer now living on their farm. It may have been explained or is obvious to any Pole, but it sure wasn’t to me.

Bill Goodykoontz in USA Today gave Ida 4 1/2 stars, I arrived at the same rank by giving the storyline 3 stars and the cinematography 5. I hadn’t seen a movie so beautifully shot since The Great Beauty (Italy 2013). Except for a few frames the movie was shot in a square format. That combined with the black and white made for a stunning presentation. After all the widescreen for the past 60 years it was a very artistic change.

There were some intriguing points to contemplate in the film. Aunt Wanda was put-off by the idea of Ida becoming a nun. Wanda also seemed to have quite a bit of knowledge  of Christianity. Keeping in mind that the film is set in the Poland in the early sixties, the Soviet Union seems to get a pass for the oppression it grips it’s satellite country with. Plus, you have the age old question, was Wanda an alcoholic because she was a basket case, or vice versa? Did she come to her untimely demise because she had no spiritual anchor, or was it unavoidable considering her circumstances?

Ida (Anna) had the more hopeful story. Though her life was put through this really intense tempest (finding out the fate of her parents and her own heritage while being bombarded by the sensual stimulation of a world she’s never known), she seemed to be able to survive and thrive due to her spiritual foundation. It seemed appropriate when Ida delays taking her vows, and instead experiences the ways of the world. After her exposure to life’s temptations, when she returns to the nunnery it seems to be with no regrets, now that she knows what the world offers is empty promises. You do wonder why she doesn’t try to evangelize her obviously troubled aunt.

In one of the grittiest scenes since Winter’s Bone when Jennifer Lawrence has to remove the hands from her dead father to prove he is dead to the court, Ida, Wanda and the murderer farmer dig up the bones of her parents and brother, place them in a burlap bag and take them to be simply reburied in a family burial plot. The sound of the bones clinking in the bag as she puts them in the trunk of the car struck me as impossibly raw. It really brings home the whole death, murder and mortality thing.

Director Pawel Pawlikowski did such an unpretentious yet beautiful job with this film, it will be interesting to see what the Polish director does with the upcoming Georgian/Russian-language film Kamo about the early career of Joseph Stalin. People from the former Soviet-bloc usually have a much better grasp of what a demon Stalin was, then we do.

IDA b (2) 2

“Most films today substitute sex and violence for virtue, and compensate for lack of substance and message with excessive sound.”

Belle

Belle (2) aajhfjh
Lauren Julien-Box as the young ‘Dido Belle’

Now that was a good film. It reminded me of the year ‘The King’s Speech’ came out. That film so outclassed what Hollywood puts out, as will this one. In a world full of Spidermen, X-men and Godzilla, it is nice to run across a film for adults. If you were to judge by the films at the mall, you would be convinced we are a nation of 12-year-olds. Belle was shown at the Fleur.

While the film is called a work of fiction, the event triggering the major event in the film is real, the 1781 Zong massacre. The coldblooded murder of humans for the insurance money. That event predated Britain’s Slavery Abolition Act of 1833. That was largely the work of William Wilberforce.

Gugu Mbatha-Raw was exceptional as Dido, as was Tom Wilkerson as Lord Mansfield. The writer, which seems to have been in question whether Amma Asante or Misan Sagay, put some lines together towards the end of the film that were truly inspired. Those words put the absolute horror of slavery bare before the audience. The young lawyer played by Sam Reid, and Wilkerson’s judge, did justice to the writing.

As was pointed out to me, why are the British capable of such stellar films and television on a regular basis, and America isn’t?

Fleur sign 1

 

Charlatans and hucksters

So I flip over to TBN (Trinity Broadcasting Network) this Sunday morning about 8 am, and I see this preacher convincing an audience to use the bible as a roadmap to wealth. I wait long enough to see the name Dr. Ed Young – ‘The Winning Walk’, yeah.

You flip over to the Inspiration Network, owned by Morris Cerullo, and you can see Mike Murdock and Todd Coontz promising you rewards if you “sow your financial seed now!”

Good grief. On local KPSZ Praise 940 radio they have had forever Ken and Lynette Hagin and Charles Capps teaching you how to “name it and claim it!”

What is it with Pentecostals and Assemblies of God people? You can go all the way back to Jim and Tammy Faye Bakker, and say what you will, but more often than not those two denominations are making a bad representation for Jesus.

It all seems to come down to the speaking of tongues. As I heard one guy say who grew up in the Pentecostal movement, and left after 23 years, he had never seen someone interpret another’s “tongues”. The bible seems to make it clear that that is a key ingredient to the authentic speaking of tongues, if there has even been such a thing since the time of Pentecost. If there is no one there who can interpret it, or benefit from it, there is no purpose to it.

People who are delusional in one area, seem to also be susceptible in other areas.

As a wonderful preacher by the name of Adrian Rogers explained, speaking in tongues should accomplish three things, otherwise it is babble. Does it glorify God? Does it communicate to someone who would otherwise not be able to understand? Does it convey the original intent, that the gospel should be taken to the everyone? (the gentile also)

I would say the modern “full gospel church” is full of something alright, their contrivance that the Holy Spirit is possessing them does not pass the biblical test on the speaking of tongues.

The point being, Christians have a hard enough time being good representatives for Jesus. As Gandhi said, Christianity would be okay, if it wasn’t for the Christians. We shall trip and fall on a daily basis on our own. We don’t need outright conmen to tar us further.

What posses’ “Christian” programming to be dominated by these people is beyond me. Once again it seems to come down to “follow the money”.

Cross_On_Hill_freecomputerdesktopwallpaper_1280

[Matthew 6]

“And when you come before God, don’t turn that into a theatrical production either. All these people making a regular show out of their prayers, hoping for stardom! Do you think God sits in a box seat?

Here’s what I want you to do: Find a quiet, secluded place so you won’t be tempted to role-play before God. Just be there as simply and honestly as you can manage. The focus will shift from you to God, and you will begin to sense his grace.”

Kurt Cobain… who?

aaa Kurt-kurt-cobain-1285555-1024-768

[USA Today, 4/4] Check our photo gallery this afternoon of rock legend Kurt Cobain, who committed suicide 20 years ago Saturday at age 27. The pictures are from Life’s new book about the Nirvana frontman. See the photos and remember at usatoday.com/life.”

Never got this one. Never heard him. Never saw him. Don’t think I want to. I know the media is obsessed with him and his very strange widow Courtney Love. Never got her either. So Time/Life comes out with a book on this very hairy dead man? Hmm. Pop culture, go figure. I wonder who owns the rights to his music? Follow the money. That’s the only thing I can figure.

The other thing I’m curious about, is how can you be a “legend” when 90 % of the world has never heard what it is you are supposedly so famous for?

Eccentricity lives in ‘Tim’s Vermeer’

aaa b Tim's Vermeer (2)
photograph by DME

So Tim Jenison (of Iowa) wants to figure out how Dutch Master Johannes Vermeer was able to paint masterpieces with out doing preliminary sketches on the canvas first (x-rays) or being able to directly trace (additive qualities of pigment prevent that). Okay, we get that. And he figures out the little mirror tool that will allow him to do that. Okay.

So what does any of that have to do with turning it into a 5 year project by learning to build the furniture for the set of Vermeer’s ‘The Music Lesson’? Learning to create oil painting pigments by hand? Melting glass to make your own focusing lens? Then sanding it by hand??

The FILM seemed like it lasted 5 years! Good night, then to top it off, they didn’t even get into painting techniques! Supposedly the point of the movie! But I do know more now than I ever wanted to about furniture making and grinding glass. Good grief. Everything was shown BUT the supposed point of the movie! I thought sure he would invent the vacuum cleaner also, as it really sucked.

A1 IMG_1657 (2) kfki 10-13

At least a very good Mocha was had at Zanzibar’s beforehand.

” ‘Son of God’ brings Jesus to a whole new generation”

aaa son_of_god_xxlg

[Patrick Ryan, USA Today, 2/28] Ryan does a dutiful article devoid of cynicism on the Mark Burnett/Roma Downey release of Son of God. Bill Goodykoontz, also of USA Today, points out that Burnett and Downey are making a bit of a “cash grab”. They are releasing unused footage from the History Channel The Bible series, reediting it, and making a movie on the cheap.

Maybe I’m being a little too suspicious. Though I didn’t see The Bible series, I assume it had to say the name of Jesus and relate the gospel message. Maybe this movie does mark a turnaround. I’m just a little leery of Downey who for 9 seasons rode a money train with a series called Touched by an Angel, that was purportedly about the Christian faith, but not once mentioned the name of Jesus.

Their idea of redemption was a hair light being shown on the Monica character, and she saying God! in a dramatic tone while the miscreant of the day changed his ways, and by his now being a better person, would warrant a trip to heaven.

Shows like that and Highway to Heaven almost seem to do a disservice to Christianity in my book, but that’s Hollywood. Maybe if the proceeds were being donated to hungry children. Until then, I’ll remain just a little bit skeptical. Hollywood doesn’t mind making a buck off of the Creator of the universe, Jesus, just don’t expect a revival to start from the 90210 zip code.

“Philip Seymour Hoffman died of drug mix”

aaa philip-seymour-hoffman

“Final results of actor’s autopsy rule death an accident”, Haley Blum, USA Today, 3/1. Once again, for reasons unknown to me, we are urged to feel especially sad when a famous person dies.

The irony in a celebrity’s drug death never occurs to the media. The entertainment industry for decades has given a wink and a nod to drug and alcohol use and abuse in their movies and music. The Hollywood types in fact ridicule “old-fashioned” morality and virtues that might help keep people alive.

People like Steven Tyler of Aerosmith, and the cast of SNL get rich promoting how “cool” drug use is. Then, when their life is about to self-destruct, the resources and support network of the rich kick in and pull their bacon out of the fire. Meanwhile, their fan base, who bought the bill of goods, go on to unstopped destruction. Never do these rehabilitated celebs apologize for what they promoted and glamorized. Never do they go on anti-drug campaigns. Never do they do community service to right their wrongs. Nope. They just hold a big show funeral and the crap continues.

SNL gets thumped

abc Sasheer-Zamata-720x600
Sasheer Zamata

The 1/20 DM Register had a brief “People in the News” blurb about the Saturday Night Live debut of Sasheer Zamata. The liberal icon SNL got seriously whacked last fall when it was pointed out by their own, that out of 137 previous cast members, only 4 had been black females.

I can’t help but be a little admiring of Sasheer for having the guts to be on the show with such an embarrassing spotlight on herself. True, the spotlight should have been on Lorne Michaels (Lipowitz). Even though SNL is out of NYC, it is all part of the entertainment industry, whose flagship, Hollywood, has one of the most blatant track records of racial discrimination, yet never gets called on it.

The history of Hollywood is the history of exclusion. It continues to this day. The seventies had more diversity, Sanford and Son, The Jeffersons, Good Times, Different Stokes, Webster, among others. Today it is just embarrassing. Look at the primetime offerings, who do you see? 30 years after The Cosby Show, where is the inclusion? Hollywood has always been rife with a Jim Crow mentality, and this latest indictment of SNL almost makes you feel sorry for them. But I don’t.

Who did you see in the old movies? Unless it was the occasional maid or butler, you saw white people. What did you see on old TV? Did Bonanza or the Andy Griffith Show ever have a black person on it? Pretty sure they didn’t. How about more modern TV, like The Golden Girls? Lots of diversity on there was it?

The irony of it all is there is no more liberal a bastion than Hollywood, and there is none more racist. I wonder how it got that way? I wonder who controls it? It’s almost like their is a click there that works to keep out others that they feel don’t belong.

Looking at the history of comedy, Adam Sandler, Robin Williams, Jerry Seinfeld, Michael Richards, Jason Alexander, Brad Garrett, Billy Crystal, Jon Stewart, Woody Allen, Lenny Bruce, Madeline Kahn, Joan Rivers, Mel Brooks, Milton Berle, George Burns, the Marx Brothers, The Three Stooges, Sid Caesar, Buddy Hackett, Albert Brooks, Fran Drescher, Fanny Brice, Ben Stiller, Henny Youngman, Don Rickles, Larry David, Rodney Dangerfield, Seth Rogen, Richard Lewis, Gilda Radner, Gene Wilder… it is almost like there is a common thread tying them all together, I just can’t put my finger on it. Almost tribal in nature. Not that I’m saying publishing, broadcasting, movies, and the music industry are dominated by one group.

So when SNL got busted for their exclusionary behavior, I was not completely surprised. My only surprise was how long it took the public to begin to get an inkling of what has been going on for over 100 years.

IMG_3497 (2) kdfvik

Inside Llewyn Davis

a Inside Llewyn Davis (2)
Oscar Isaac and Ulysses the cat from ‘Inside Llewyn Davis’

Oy. Inside Llewyn Davis gets old really quick. You know a movie is bad when you find yourself leaning forward a lot to rest your back, and checking your watch.  I’m thinking the supposed popularity of the Coen brothers, is much like that of the folk music hero hinted at near the end of the movie, Robert Zimmerman, the joke’s on us. I’ve seen a lot of that lately, what with American Hustle, Wolf of Wall Street, etc… crap served up that we are supposed to “ooh and awe” over, when in reality it is theater that has not been thought out really well, or had much effort put into it. No longer, bad is bad, even if the “right” people did make it.

Unable to figure out what I had just seen, I checked out the reviews on IMDB. Many reviewers thought Ethan and Joel Coen keep making the same movie with the same clichés. Many thought the “art-house crowd” would rave about anything these two put out, and if that was the case, the bar had been set way too low. They called it as having no direction, leaving threads left hanging, no character development, no point, kind of a half-baked unfinished slop.

The music was fun, the backstreets of New York were fun, Stark Sands as ‘Troy Nelson’ was superb, the interior location shots were great… it’s just that when the most likeable and entertaining character is a cat, it doesn’t bode well for the movie.

What makes a great movie? It will either come down to stars, script, or the cinematography. There was nothing likeable about the characters, the script was pointless, luckily the cinematography made the movie a 3 or so. I enjoy seeing the off the beaten path side of New York, the architecture and landscape you don’t normally see. But, if you’ve been making movies for 30 years, with all the attendant adulation, you need to come up with just a little bit more. I want my money back.