Author Archives: Iowa Life

Unknown's avatar

About Iowa Life

Experiencing life in Iowa.

How do you solve a problem like Philomena?

aaa Philomena (2)
Judi Dench as ‘Philomena’

This film was a bit of an odd duck. Steve Coogan as journalist ‘Martin Sixsmith’ was superb. Judi Dench as ‘Philomena Lee’ was probably wonderful, she just tends to grate on my nerves. She had two outstanding scenes, one in the confessional and one where she forgave the bastard head nun.

As we all know, Philomena is now searching 50 years later for the son she was pretty much forced to give up as a child herself. Now that I think about it, the film might have tracked down the sperm donor also to see how he felt about the carnage he helped create in these two lives. What we do see is how this event from 50 years ago affected Philomena and her son Anthony, whose adopted parents named Michael.

The film’s center is the convent Roscrea, headed by the evil Nazi nun, Sister Hildegarde. In real life, the nuns probably found it necessary to sell the babies to American Catholics at 1,000 pounds a pop, in order to keep things running, it just looks bad. And they probably had a reason for not having a doctor and drugs available for the births these young mothers went through, but given the way it was portrayed by Weinstein  and Frears, it does look rather bad.

The audience is at the mercy of the storytellers. We hope they aren’t misleading us. But mothers and children being allowed to die in childbirth for no other apparent reason than spite, does strain credibility at times, but not others. Institutions as a whole could be rather screwed up back then (if not now). The Boy Scouts and the church were masters at covering up the sexual abuse of boys. It is only in the last 15 years or so that Iowa has had a safe haven law allowing women to drop off their newborn alive to a hospital, no questions asked.

What kind of nitwits were we? “Heaping shame” on unwed mothers? That certainly wouldn’t lead to the abuse of alcohol, drugs or the children now would it? What would we rather they had done, have an abortion? Certainly you wouldn’t sugar coat it, but I do believe a “where do we go from here?” attitude would have been more useful. How do we “pull ourselves up” would have been a good tact.

That could be the message of the makers of the film. You just don’t know. With producer Harvey Weinstein, he does have a history of anti-Catholic films, The Magdalene Sisters, The Butcher Boy, Priest and now Philomena. Since the messenger is questionable, you tend to question the message.

Still, the movie does make you think. The boy who grows up in a well-to-do family in America with unlimited opportunities, did have a different experience then what he would have being raised by a destitute unwed mother in Ireland. You just tend to be a little suspicious, when the only time the name of “Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ” is heard, is when it is fairly spit out by the serpent like evil head nun when her treachery is revealed. That just tends to smack of something Hollywood would do, tying it to the most vile scene of the movie. But, as it is also when Philomena forgives the nun, you can also relate it in scope and power to He who forgave all our sins.

IMG_4635 root beer

‘Billy Jack’ dead at 82

abc Billy-Jack-2
Tom Laughlin as Billy Jack

Any boomer worth his salt remembers the Billy Jack franchise of films. The tough hippie with a heart of gold. They were a big deal back in the early seventies. Everyone had heard of Billy Jack. The page of “recent deaths” of celebrities in the Sunday paper had a couple of interesting tidbits in the article about Tom Laughlin’s life.

They said his “production and marketing of Billy Jack set a standard for breaking the rules on and off the screen”. And, “a long struggle by Laughlin to gain control of the low-budget, self-financed movie, a model for guerilla filmmaking”. That’s interesting, why would you have to have a legal struggle to “gain control” of a self-financed movie? Why would you have to fight and scratch to make movies at all? Isn’t that the purpose of Hollywood?

That caused me to go to Wikipedia and read up on Laughlin. Hard as it may be to believe, it kind of sounds like Warner Brothers tried to cheat him out of various rights to his property, including television rights. I know it sounds ridiculous that a Hollywood studio would try to cheat someone, but that’s the way it sounds.

Searching for the cause of this dislike of Laughlin, I looked at his earlier career. I saw the 1960 Christian film, The Young Sinner. Then there was the 1963 Christian film, We Are All Christ. Then there was the 1965 Christian film that was never completed about a Catholic priest named Father William DuBay. So I can’t imagine what it would be that would cause a young Christian in Hollywood to have trouble making films. I’m stumped.

Hollywood says they  just “make what people want to see”, so you would have thought they would embrace the wildly popular Laughlin. The guy who made huge profits on barely financed films. Nope, they fought tooth and nail to stifle him, shut him down and rip him off, I can’t imagine why.

“American Hustle” ripped me off!

abcd American Hustle (2)

Oh my gosh that was a bad movie! I want my $7 back. I was so excited to see it, I had read the review in the Friday paper by Bill Goodykoontz, 4 1/2 Stars, the delicious  Jennifer Lawrence was in it, an 11:00 showing Saturday morning at the Fleur, how does it get any better than that? The reviews conned me into seeing it. Who paid them off? I would really like to know what is behind a deception like this. Oscar talk? For what??? It was a bomb. Luckily no one died, it was that bad. They spent $40 million on this?

Identifying a quality movie isn’t that tough. It will either have great performances, a great script, or wonderful cinematography. This movie had about 5 minutes of each, and that don’t cut it. I remember when Jennifer Lawrence won the Oscar for Silver Linings Playbook, I was a little suspicious then. I’m thinking, what movie did they watch?  For God’s sake, Winter’s Bone was three times the movie that piece of trash was, and it didn’t get squat. I’m thinking, is director David O. Russell wired in? Is that what this is all about? Yep, that’s it. Bloodlines. There ain’t no other way to explain it.

With all the 4 1/2 Star reviews and Oscar buzz, I was all psyched up to see this. The closest thing to a good performance was Jeremy Renner as Mayor Carmine Polito. His part also included the only attempt at cinematography, before the speech. Lawrence’s character was so clichéd and two dimensional it was a crime. DeNiro as a mobster, oooh, how original is that …. Russell ran with the same cast and the same tendencies. They say some authors keep writing the same book, well some directors keep making the same movie.

Christian Bale and Bradley Cooper probably have some real talent, it was just very well hidden by the director. Amy Adams is just irritating. Now that she is big time, Lawrence will probably never make another decent picture. Oh well, we’ll always have Burning Plain, Poker House and Winter’s Bone. Time to move on, next good actress please!

Hollywood needs to institute a few rules. 1.) No recognizable stars for one year. 2.) Only new scripts, no remakes or sequels for one year. 3.) No directors who have had a previous feature film, only directors of shorts and documentaries. 4.) No budgets over 4 million dollars. 5.) Perhaps the only real answer, Hollywood must close for one year. The only thing that could be shown are foreign films and student films.

That might be best, flush the system, scrap it all and start over. Seriously folks, I just read it in today’s paper, Paul Rudd has been cast to play, wait for it, Ant-Man! Are we serious? Ant-Man? Are we a nation of 12-year-olds? Over the last 20 years, we’ve had how many comic book superheroes? I wonder who owns the rights to all that crap? Follow the money. What’s scary, is that Hollywood influences (infects) the entire world. Maybe if there were more independent theaters, there would be more independent films, less control, more art. A 16-year-old with a Canon and 14 days can do better than this. I saw a film at a festival that they shot on a Nokia phone, they didn’t spend no $40 million making that one. Hollywood has everything but talent. Tyler Perry at his worst is better than this, at least then you see new faces.

The only good thing out of it was a trip to Zanzibar’s!

[As an example, last year Ben Affleck as director of  Argo,  set the mood , the time period, and the context for the exact same period as Hustle. THAT’S how you do it! ]

abcd Busy! (2)

abcde Mocha (2)

abcdefg Zanzibar's pets (2)

abcdef The Fleur (2)

abcdefg Hustle (2)
Don’t let it hustle you!                                                                          All photographs by DME

A Madea Christmas

aaa Q3MDE@__V1__SX640_SY720_
‘Lacey’ played by Tika Sumpter and Conner in A Madea Christmas

Hmm… talk about hot and cold. Wow, and I love Tyler Perry. I can imagine what the people who hate him are saying. That movie was all over the place. I think Tyler needs to discover the word “collaboration”.

As pictured above, Tika Sumpter was a great addition to the movie, as was Larry the Cable Guy, Kathy Najimy and a young Noah Urrea. That’s the part I love about Tyler Perry movies, all the new faces you’ll never see anywhere else. The locations are good.

But man, that writing… the “black folks running from the Klan in Alabama” bit, the fake southern accents by the antagonist and his son. There was zero chemistry between the Lacey and Conner characters. One minute so good, the next so bad.

I support Tyler’s Christmas movie, because he hammers the point home in the film what Christmas is supposed to be about. I’ll give him that, he’s not afraid to  say the ‘J’ word. But man dude, get some help on the writing…

“A film icon comes stomping back into theaters”

gtorcht

Really? 10,000 scripts in Hollywood, and you got to go back 60 years and resuscitate a very mediocre monster flick? Hmm… somehow I question the creative genius behind this. It almost makes me wonder why. It almost makes me wonder who owns the rights to Godzilla. Follow the money. It is almost like the art of film making in Hollywood is more like a whorehouse, not much passion and not much honesty.

With all the original ideas out there, it just seems a shame. The line I like best is when Hollywood says, “we just make what people want to see… “. Poppycock. The biggest moneymakers have always been G Rated family flicks. The movies everyone can go to, movies like the Sound of Music, Star Wars, ET, Twister, The Lion King, not psychologically  disturbed Quentin Tarantino crap. The same thing happens on TV. It might not be great theater that people flock to, but it isn’t the crap Hollywood is trying to force on us.

The Great Beauty

GB peach
Photograph by DME

Paolo Sorrentino’s film has been called by critics a tribute to fellow Italian director Federico Fellini. That does make me want to see La Dolce Vita and Roma, because if this is a tribute, I want to see the inspiration.

Toni Servillo is ‘Jep Gambordella’, the aging playboy who discovers upon his 65th birthday that there may be more to life than eternal narcissism. Eternity seems beckoning, and questions about the great beyond aren’t answered here, but they are alluded to.

I assume The Great Beauty of the films title is a combination of the beauty of the main character’s first love Elisa, Rome itself and maybe life in general. Contrasted with this beauty is the ugliness of the wretched excess of Jep’s life until now.

I cannot say with 100 % certainty (but close to), that Hollywood could never make a movie like this from a technical aspect at least. From my point of view, why this movie is so beautiful in and of itself, is the photography. The lighting to be specific.

Hollywood is more about things going flash – bang (!) in a very loud way. Computer Generated Images and product merchandising are more their style. The idea that they could pull off what Sorrentino has, staggers the mind.

Any photographer has had those times where it all comes together in a perfect shoot. This film is 2 hours and 20 minutes of perfect shots. Not knowing anything about film production, I would have to guess the credit goes to cinematographer Luca Bigazzi, or maybe it is some lighting director. I would not be surprised to learn that it was shot on actual film, it is that rich.

Maybe 20 % of the movie was shot in daylight. The rest of the film  was shot at dusk, twilight and night. Most people can’t do that well, this film did. At those light levels you have to be spot on with exposures. The result is deep colors and wonderful shadows.

The other aspect besides Toni Servillo’s performance and the lighting, was the pulsing music during the dance scenes. It seemed to capture the essence of the “passionate” Italians.

IMG_4635 root beer

‘The Book Thief’

aaa The Book Thief! (2)
photograph by DME

Now that was fun. Sure it was dealing once again with Hollywood’s singular obsession with Adolf Hitler. This time they at least hinted at the 5.3 million “other” that also perished. That was a nice change. The title character’s mother, a communist, being “taken away”, we assume murdered.

The Book Thief is played wonderfully well by Sophie Nélisse. She, Geoffrey Rush and a young Rudy played by Nico Liersch were the saving graces of the film. The storyline and cinematography were nothing to write home about.

As it turns out, war is hell, and as evidenced by our modern world, we have  not learned that lesson since the time this story took place some 75 years ago.

Towards the end of the film, there is the “there’s got to be a morning after” shot of the German village, with a subtitle, “1945, Americans occupy Germany”; with the implied hope of a new beginning. The thought that ran through my head, was that Hitler occupied various parts of Europe, then we and the Soviets did, now Muslims do. I don’t think Europeans will be getting rid of  them. Europeans lost a war they didn’t know they were fighting.

Bagel Beau (2) amfjti

bbb Movies 12 from Subway (2)

“Coming up next, your Black Friday forecast!”

So I’m watching the morning news on KCCI channel 8 yesterday (Wednesday), and the weatherman Kurtis Gertz goes, “Coming up next, your Black Friday forecast!”. We live in a sick world.

This morning the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade was on. It laid the groundwork for this sickness. It was the infection that got worse. Inflatable cartoon figures and sweatshop made garments is what Thanksgiving is all about the TV parade hosts have told us for decades now.

Your life will be incomplete if you don’t spend yourself into oblivion, they would have you believe. Life as we know it will end if you don’t go stand inline tomorrow to buy Chinese plastic! You have to have it! (Whatever it is!) Without the “hot” new piece of plastic, your life is ruined!

It has gotten so bad, that the actual day of Thanksgiving, is an afterthought! The ONLY thing that matters is giving your money to the corporate altar. Worshipping consumerism. Thanking the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost for your health, comforts, family and friends, does not benefit corporations. Long live stupidity.

Walking away (2)

photograph by DME